The bulk
of our welfare cost is on the state pension.
Politicians have repeatedly shied
away from suggesting there should be cuts in that area of spending, as it isn’t
a vote winner with older people, who are usually more inclined to turn out at
elections.
Targeting something like housing benefit is easier politically, but
housing benefit is not just paid to households where no one is working, it is
paid to many pensioners and households who are earning but on low paid.
We
spend four times as much on state pensions as we do on housing benefit,
but if Osborne is determined to squeeze another £25bn out of Government
spending while protecting pay-outs to pensioners, then it is housing benefit,
jobseekers allowance and carers allowance that are likely to feel the brunt.
Here’s
a breakdown of how the DWP spent their entire benefits budget in 2011-12.
Benefit
|
Cost
in £bn Percentage
in
2011-12 of Budget
|
State
Pension
|
74.2 46.32%
|
Housing
Benefit
|
16.9 10.55%
|
Disability
Living Allowance
|
12.6 7.87%
|
Pension
Credit and Minimum Income Guarantee
|
8.1 5.06%
|
Income
Support
|
6.9 4.31%
|
Rent
Rebates
|
5.4 3.37%
|
Attendance
Allowance
|
5.3 3.31%
|
Incapacity
Benefit
|
4.9 3.06%
|
Jobseekers
Allowance
|
4.9 3.06%
|
Council
Tax Benefit
|
4.8 3.00%
|
Employment
and Support Allowance
|
3.6 2.25%
|
Statutory
Sick Pay and Statutory Maternity Pay
|
2.5 1.56%
|
Other
benefits
|
10.1 6.30%
|
No comments:
Post a Comment