It is with sadness that I will be stepping down from the whips office
following a short period staying on to help the new leader through the
transitional period. It has taken a lot of thought over the summer and I
believe it is the right and fair thing to do given Jeremy's victory.
I congratulate him on that victory, on bringing hope to many, of the
increases in new members and the chance to look at issues afresh. The
chance to shake Westminster up and rebuild the Labour Party. I am
particularly pleased that Jeremy is going to radically change our
housing policy and our attitude to the EU referendum.
Jeremy is a
principled, kind and throughly decent person who wishes only the best
for others and his demeanour is to be applauded.
Having had the
opportunity to speak to Jeremy at length whilst we were away together in
Latin America it was clear we both had much in common but there is no
getting away from the fact that there are issues where we strongly
differ. That breadth of view is healthy for the Labour Party as Jeremy
has acknowledged.
However those differences will be tested.
Being a whip and not voting for the leader is unfair - it is a resigning
matter. I believe it is quite right to be up front and clear about
those differences now, not later.
We broadly or wholly agree on
Europe, agree on building more council houses and tackling the private
rented sector, on renationalising the railways, on the need to fix
broken markets and deal with private rented housing, more protection for
workers' rights, scrapping tuition fees, creating a National Education
Service (like the NHS for healthcare), ending child poverty, ensuring
the NHS is completely publicly run, some degree of rent controls, more
investment in the arts and many other issues.
At the last
election I like many of the volunteers who campaigned for the Labour
Party in Hyndburn knocked on doors and stood behind our manifesto
pledges which included fiscal responsibility, controls on immigration as
well as policies on strong defence, membership of NATO, Trident nuclear
submarines and a degree of welfare reform. These are issues where
Jeremy and I have differing views.
MPs now must face up to this
dilemma; their principles, current Labour policies which they stood on
in May, Jeremy's victory and his manifesto for radical change, in
Hyndburn the 18,000 votes Labour received in May or, the greater number
of people who thought about voting Labour in May and then there are the
Labour Party members in Hyndburn whom I know will hold strong views on
some of these issues.
Each MP will deal with this dilemma in
their own way and Jeremy has been very clear about his respect for
people with differing views. He acknowledges he himself has held
differing and principled views for over 30 years and voted against the
Party over 500 times. We all agree that the Labour Party must remain a
broad church appealing to a wide range of voters to be electorally
successful.
In the end I want to stand by what I have always
stood for; traditional blue collar Labour values and I believe it is
both honourable and decent as well as the best for Jeremy (and myself)
that I speak on these issues from the backbenches.